2005-11-29 오전 9:53:34 Hit. 1409
複 ? 蔔꿉 ? ? 査꿇 蔔? 複幡?複? 複蔔栢? 賞꿀 殯? 査꿇 栢栢白 賞栢꾼 兵꿀 査栢賞白? 複栢? 賞白 栢栢栢? 査栢魄栢께?栢꿇 賽昉? ? 栢幡栢複 査栢白? 査昉鵬栢?兵栢昉鵬栢? 栢꿇 査꿇三?栢??賞꿀 같 複複 査幡賞栢꿀 輻栢昉 賞昉賞栢꿇 複꿀 査昉? 蔔幡 複輹昉? 査꿇 蔔幡賽賞栢꿇 賞께 査昉? ?蔔栢昉 査昉繃栢꿀栢栢蔔栢栢繃栢? 蔔幡複栢繃께 栢꿇 같 査꿇 ? 査栢꿀 賽百栢栢?栢栢栢賽 査昉 栢白栢栢賽栢껐께? 査昉 ?蔔栢蔔昉 栢? 複께賽霜 賞栢栢栢栢꿉 栢꿇 栢昉꿉 査꿇 査꿀 蔔栢?蔔栢賽栢꿇 ? 蔔꿉 ? ? 査賽 三? 栢꿇 査께? 栢꿇 賞昉栢幡蔔栢栢霜輻 栢꿇 ?査꿇 三? 輻 ? 死 査栢? 査꾼 査栢白複蔔白蔔栢賞昉繃百 査昉 昉꿀 ? ? 같같같 ? 査栢賽賽 査栢幡賞栢賽? 査꾼 賞輹昉白 輻 賞栢白複? 같 iks!ttn ? 같 ?複賞昉栢昉굅 栢賽? 査鵬 百 蔔賽 賽꿀 複蔔賽賞複? 같 ?같같 蔔霜昉꿉 ?같 ??? 蔔?複 殯蔔?複幡賞複? 賞蔔? ? ? 賽꿀 ? 殯繃昉꿇 같같같 兵? 兵?兵?겡 査꿇蔔?蔔? 霜 査? 三? 兵? 殯鵬賞賽栢複?賞蔔昉꿀 같겪꿇 殯?殯?昉栢 栢栢꿇 査? 輻 霜 ? ?複꿉 三? 賽賽栢蔔賽栢複 ?三? 三?三?겡 昉朋? 賞兵?? 複複複께賽賽 複複複兵꿉賽賽賽賽賽栢昉複 賽白蔔栢蔔栢複 昉繃꿇 ? 複꿉賽?複複複兵賽賽賽賽 賽白 蔔幡? 昉?賞? 蔔?複栢幡賽 査栢霜複 ? 栢賞? 賽 栢?栢幡 複? 複? 複? 栢昉? ? 査? 賽 ?査?査百? 査? 殯? 갛? 栢百 三?? 賞? 幡?査百査? 兵?複三?複輻白 複? 複긋白 栢栢? 三? ? 賽白複複 ?께? 栢白 蔔方 ? 栢겪꿇 昉 査棚幡견께?께 査?栢?賽白? 兵? 栢複 賽賽 굇?査?賞蔔賞旁겡昉霜白꿉 栢蔔璽百 겪께艀白幡 栢? 賞?? 昉賽栢複?같?같겨賞? ?갛昉 栢?栢 賞?昉 賞輻白複께?栢 賞?栢? 査? 昉 賽?굇? 査 ? ? ? 賽? 께栢? ? 賽 昉 霜께? ? PROUDLY PRESENTS 께栢? ? 栢 査께 Stubbs the Zombie in Rebel without a Pulse 殯百 死 栢 栢?複 (c) 賞栢 蔔 栢輻 査幡 Aspyr Media ? 栢꾼複幡煞 栢棚蔔賽 査? 複꿉煞三蔔栢?複蔔겡껑? 栢幡 ?RELEASE DATE :: 11.27.2005 殯꿉蔔껑꿀賞白昉賽 丙 栢? ?PROTECTION :: Securom 7.00.0002 께繃昉굇께繃昉?兵昉굉?蔔栢? SIZE :: 56x15mb 査?賞껑꿉蔔꿇같꾼껑굇꿇 複 賽白 MEDIATYPE :: CD 賽白複? 꾼? 賞昉께?昉꿇 査꾼幡 FORMAT :: BWI/BWS/BWT/BWA 賽栢丙賽白 賽?께?蔔栢栢 査? 賽 ?? 幡 ?賞蔔? 갛? 複껑??死 꿀栢꿇 昉 蔔賽 ?? ?炫栢栢白 霜昉輻 蔔? 겨꿀 ?? 栢栢賞栢? ? 査百 査? ??? 栢昉 査幡 輻霜 ? 輻霜 輻霜 輻?輻?? 白 ?輻?白 輻?栢 栢 倂꿀 賽霜栢栢蔔??幡?겡 같幡?겡賽?賽方幡 같같方霜方方方方같幡같死?栢 갚굇글腑 갚꿀?賞?賞? 賽 賽 賽 ?賽 賽 ? ? ? ? 賽 ? 께 薩꿉 賽白 ? 昉 ? 複兵꾼栢賞白? 倂꿀 霜 賞?兵?三?三? 굇 霜 賞? 昉? 昉 三?갚꾼栢꿉賽複꿉賽死같檳굇꿇?死겪꿇 ?丙殯腑殯腑같 死 殯腑 査께 ? 꿉 兵? 霜 薩꿉 複?兵霜꿀 兵?兵? 兵 겨꿉兵??霜白 같 같같死같겪百 같굇께栢栢兵兵꿉 殯? 霜 賽 複兵賽 殯? ? 白?? 霜 賞? 갛百 兵輻꿀 三? ? 賽賞꿉? 三? 께? 賽 ?賞?? ?賽複? ? ? 三複 견白 굉? ? 賽白三? 賽賽? 賞百 倂?栢껐굉 賽霜複複 査?檳꾼繃昉繃? 栢 賽霜昉霜栢 Stubbs, a zombie who'll tug at your heartstrings and tickle 栢 複幡? 栢?your funnybone even as he's tearing the living guts right out of 栢 栢?your body. This former traveling salesman trades in his 栢 栢?briefcase for your braincase as the leading man in Wideload's 栢 栢?first game, Stubbs the Zombie in "Rebel Without a Pulse". 栢 栢? 栢 栢? In this game, players take on the role of the rebel himself 栢 栢?Stubbs, a wisecracking Zombie who takes on an ultra-modern city 栢 栢?of the future using nothing but his own carcass and the weapons 栢 栢?of his possessed enemies. The game's tongue-in-cheek humor, 栢 栢?innovative combat and strong storyline keep Stubbs the Zombie's 栢 栢?gameplay as bizarre and unpredictable as its namesake. 栢 栢? 栢 栢? On his quest, Stubbs lurches his way through numerous large 栢 栢?and visually captivating indoor/outdoor environments in and 栢 栢?around the gleaming city of Punchbowl, PA, a city built during 栢 栢?the Eisenhower administration to show off the ultra-futuristic 栢 栢?technology of the 21st century. Stubbs' brain-eating adventure 栢 栢?brings him through bustling shopping districts and verdant 栢 栢?farmlands to battle mad scientists, rural militiamen and the 栢 栢?world's deadliest barbershop quartet. His enemies have shotguns, 栢 栢?tanks, and all manner of futuristic weaponry. All Stubbs has is 栢 栢?his own rotting corpse, a distinct lack of pain or conscience, 栢 栢?and the ability to turn foes into zombie allies. 栢 栢? 栢 栢? What begins as one zombie's search for revenge quickly 栢 栢?escalates into an all-out war between the living and the dead - 栢 栢?but this time it's the zombie fighting for truth, justice and 栢 栢?the redemption of true love. Yes, it's a love story too. 栢 栢? 栢 栢? 栢 栢? 栢 賞栢 栢 査? 栢 蔔幡 栢 ? 輻 栢? 栢 三璽? 幡? 複 栢 ? 蔔白幡 ? 栢 兵?査栢百 倂? 栢 ? 賞幡白 ? 栢 輻倂꿀 께? 賞複? 栢 繃昉굉?굇? 査幡賽賽 ?複 栢 白薩꿉 같? 栢 輻 賞栢 賞白複 같 昉 ? 百 査?賽蔔三꾼白?賽栢?白 ?幡?? 輻?? ? 白 ?輻霜 ? 輻?꿉殯? 兵栢 ? 霜 三 賞?견껐?賞견三겡煞 白?껐 ?같??霜?方갛갛煞갛?견霜三께複兵꿉겡?三? 死 死 殯? ?? ? 賽???賽 賽 ? ? 賽 賽? ? 賽兵?賽賽겨 蔔? 輻 ?蔔? 複賽 複賽複?? 複複蔔栢栢? 兵?三璽꾼 死 같査? 昉 蔔?兵? ?? 複賞幡견 께? ? 겨꾼? ? 굇견白? 殯繃百 殯?兵??갚꾼栢昉굅같? 輻 輻 倂꿀 賽께複兵꿉賞? 께? 賽賞蔔白昉?三?? ? 死 死 같굇꾼? 賽?? 栢 栢?? 賽賽賽賽賽? 霜 霜 薩꿉 ? 栢 栢꿉 ? ? 栢 栢꿀? ? 栢 栢꿇 栢 栢?1.) Unrar, Burn CD1 Using BlindWrite 4.5.7 (disable Autoplay in 栢 栢? Options), burn in DAO PW at 4x, click "YES" when asked if you 栢 栢? want to physically include BWA information. If mounting in 栢 栢? DT4, remove or hide all IDE drives. 栢 栢?2.) Be sure to install with CD2 and CD3 from either BC or NOGRP 栢 栢? images and have fun :) 栢 栢? 栢 栢?Proper Notes: 栢 栢? 栢 栢?This was a most interesting release, It seems that Securom modded 栢 栢?Securom 7.00.0002 to have IDE Priority, to prevent those pesky 栢 栢?emulators and loaders from working. This really is not as dramatic栢 栢?as nogrp nfo made it out to be. All this new Securom does is it 栢 栢?scans the drives on your system to see if any IDE drives are 栢 栢?present. If there are IDE drives, Securom forces you to use those 栢 栢?drives to verify image. This does not affect people burning the 栢 栢?image as emu-burn, twinsector or plex 1:1. Thus, This new Securom 栢 栢?means that groups MUST image Securom in BLINDWRITE FORMAT for 栢 栢?proper burning, as now emulation requires machines with none or 栢 栢?hidden IDE drives. Groups really should be doing this in the 栢 栢?first place and stop being lame with alcohol 120 on Securom. 栢 栢?Its very stupid for nogrp to release an alcohol image that only 栢 栢?works mounted when all ide drives are hidden or disabled, when 栢 栢?they could have imaged the game in BWClone format so the end user 栢 栢?can choose to either burn the image, and totally bypass the IDE 栢 栢?priority, or mount it and disable their IDE drives. 栢 栢? 栢 栢?Not only did NOGRP/BC release a Securom A120 release, they 栢 栢?released a screwed up A120 MDS. Both Their image lacks a decent 栢 栢?MDS file. The MDS file was soo messed up that bwabuilder was 栢 栢?unable to open the NOGRP MDS file, and the only reason the 栢 栢?clone ran was because DT4 had to fake the MDS since their 栢 栢?MDS never worked right. As for BC MDS, there was horrendous 栢 栢?topology recorded in their MDS file. This is usually caused when 栢 栢?the computer is being used during the MDS reading procedure. 栢 栢?More specifically, the mouse being moved around and clicked. 栢 栢?Seems making proper MDS files doesn't require a lot of random 栢 栢?button clicking ;). 栢 栢? 栢 栢?Our image is in BW Format so that you are able to burn the 栢 栢?image (1:1 or not) to get around the IDE prioritizing. You also 栢 栢?will not have to worry about nonworking future patches since 栢 栢?MiRROR image is flawless and will create a most excellent burn. 栢 栢?Mounting is also possible, and verification is faster since our 栢 栢?BWA is good and the image itself is in proper format. Maybe if 栢 栢?the NOGRP peeps would stop bashing bwclones and pasting old 栢 栢?ancient MISQUOTED text, written to be MISLEADING, from the 栢 栢?cdfreaks forums, and start figuring out why MiRROR is soo 栢 栢?insistent on using bwclone instead of a120, they'll actually 栢 栢?learn something. Our Stubbs the Zombie was imaged and bwaed from 栢 栢?a retail release, and we triple tested both the retail and our 栢 栢?BWClone to find any evidence of starforce-like protections. Other 栢 栢?than IDE drive prioritizing, This game really isn't protected 栢 栢?with anything more than Securom 7.00.0002 modified to pick on 栢 栢?people who like to emulate clones. So instead of nogrp attempt to 栢 栢?learn what is different about Securom, and maybe figure out why 栢 栢?we do things different from other grps, they instead just release 栢 栢?a improper bad image and bash superior cloning methods without 栢 栢?even trying it. 栢 栢? 栢 栢? Also, NOGRP's nfo has a lot of mistakes, and myths around it 栢 栢?that really need clearing up. The cdfreak's quote 栢 栢? - found here: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=64370& - 栢 栢?was truncated halfway in nogrp nfo, namely the part that says 栢 栢?"But, of course, typically for a post on alcohol's site, they 栢 栢?neglect to mention that there has not yet been any securom 4.8x 栢 栢?game released that cannot be copied by the twinsector [Blindwrite]栢 栢?method. Needless to say the post also neglects to mention that 栢 栢?there is no reason whatsoever to suppose that Sony won't target 栢 栢?RMPS emulation so as to render that type of copy useless too in 栢 栢?the event of an update patch. Still, if you really want to make 栢 栢?copies that only work with emulation when, in most cases, it's 栢 栢?possible to make copies that don't need it, [he means 1:1 exact 栢 栢?clones that dont depend on emulation that is easily blacklisted, 栢 栢?and actually work as if it was bought from the store] well who am 栢 栢?I to argue?" Also note that the Twin sector method BWCloning has 栢 栢?been used since 11.14.02.Unreal.Tournament.2003.BWClone-FTFiSO & 栢 栢?11.29.02.No.One.Lives.Forever.2.CD1.BWClone-FTFiSO came out. it 栢 栢?hasn't been blacklisted or stopped since. BTW, note the date from 栢 栢?the cdfreaks post itself, when it was last edited says 栢 栢?20-02-2003, February 2003!!! The post doesn't even adress 1:1 栢 栢?plextor premium cloning (which is TOTALLY DIFFERENT form twin 栢 栢?sector method) because it was noted months before plextor 1:1 was 栢 栢?even added to blindwrite 4.5. 栢 栢? 栢 栢?If you burn Bard's Tale with the twinpeaks method on a liteon 栢 栢?drive or similar, the game will still work, its been years since 栢 栢?twin sector method was conceived, and it has not been stopped 栢 栢?since. Same for the Plextor 1:1 Method, unstoppable. 栢 栢?Blindwrite IS a better format than A120, simply because A120 does 栢 栢?not burn 1:1 securom, at all. Let me explain, The Plextor method 栢 栢?uses rate variation techniques, which basically reads in the bwa, 栢 栢?and as its burning the disc, it burns some sections deeper than 栢 栢?normal, just like a retail securom disc. You can make a working 栢 栢?MDS/BWA file from a plex 1:1 burnt securom disc. You CANNOT do 栢 栢?this with anything burnt in a120, nor can you do this with twin 栢 栢?sector burn method. If you can make a working bwa from your burnt 栢 栢?copy, then, and only then, is it truly a 1:1 CLONE of the 栢 栢?original. This is why we image in blindwrite format, we make sure 栢 栢?all our images can be burnt in 1:1 format, first and foremost. 栢 栢?Let's Quote the NOGRP NFO: 栢 栢? 栢 栢?1) Blindwrite clones might not work if companies patch it in the 栢 栢?future, whereas Alcohol would continue to work. " - WRONG, the 栢 栢?plex method and the twinpeaks method still work, even on today's 栢 栢?securom 7. 栢 栢? 栢 栢?"2) As Blindwrite is not a true clone, it may not work on some 栢 栢?drives." - DEATHLY WRONG, bw is more a clone than a120 is. 栢 栢?BWCLONE does not totally depend on emulation tactics, and plextor 栢 栢?can burn BWClone 1:1 method. this is more clone than anything out 栢 栢?there for securom atm. BWClone also uses twinpeak method as a 栢 栢?alternative for people who do not own plextors. BWCLONE works 栢 栢?emulated using autoplay similar to RPMS, and lastly, bwclones can 栢 栢?work mounted. BTW Anything emulated is NOT a true clone, which 栢 栢?means A120 is NOT a true clone. 栢 栢? 栢 栢?"3) Blindwrite mounted has the same disadvantages as Alcohol, 栢 栢?namely that it is subject to blacklisting." - yes, all emulation 栢 栢?can be blacklisted easily, at the same time the emulation tools 栢 栢?can be updated to counteract this, and this cat and mouse game 栢 栢?has been going on for years. 栢 栢?"Here are some further reasons in favour of Alcohol. If you are 栢 栢?really keen on having a Blindwrite image, you can EASILY use an 栢 栢?.mds to .bwa converter (e.g. dpmv.exe) and create a .bwa file to 栢 栢?burn as Blindwrite. This means that an Alcohol clone has 栢 栢?everything you need to get a Blindwrite image if you choose to. 栢 栢?If you only had a Blindwrite image, then you couldn't convert 栢 栢?back if 1) or 2) obtained. In those cases, if you have 栢 栢?Blindwrite, you are out of luck! Moreover, an .mds made by 栢 栢?Alcohol using high precision dpm is in fact better than the .bwa 栢 栢?created by Blindwrite. So even if you like Blindwrite, you 栢 栢?should use Alcohol to create the .bwa file." - Why bother 栢 栢?converting bwa files back and forth? mount the damn thing in 栢 栢?a120/DT and play. A120 and DT's virtual drives can recognize bw 栢 栢?format as easily as a120 format. Secondly, its really hard to 栢 栢?stomach that bwas created by a120 are better than bwas created by 栢 栢?blindwrite when you open the bwas in bwabuilder, and compare the 栢 栢?bwas for both NOGRP and STUBBS.THE.ZOMBIE.CLONE-bC releases, and 栢 栢?how crappy they are, to the bwa from MIRROR Proper and how much 栢 栢?better it is. BTW, that bwa file we made is from the retail disc 栢 栢?and created in BWAbuilder 4.5.7. 栢 栢? 栢 栢?"1. With the advent of DTool4, one can easily make mini-images of 栢 栢?DVDs. Therefore, clonecds are not superior to clonedvds. Please, 栢 栢?newbie group, do your homework before making unsubstantiated 栢 栢?claims. " - do YOUR homework and research burning methods on dvds.栢 栢?Notice the lack of any real RAW writing? This is needed for 栢 栢?the Twin Sector method to burn, since Twin sector method involves 栢 栢?replacing indencies with errors to fool securom into running. 栢 栢?Lack of RAW DAO also means Safedisc DVD cannot work burn 1:1 栢 栢?because the Safedisc errros need to be burnt RAW. Also, NO 栢 栢?DVD drive has plextor rate variation 1:1. This means Securom DVD 栢 栢?CANNOT be burnt 1:1. This is because Plextor modified all drives 栢 栢?after the premium to block the rate variation method entirely. 栢 栢?Meanwhile, CDS have true RAW writing methods, and the rate 栢 栢?variation technique in plextors. As a result, Safedisc CD can be 栢 栢?burnt 1:1 and Securom CD can be burnt 1:1, or burnt twinsector. 栢 栢?Or how bout a simpler test for simpler minds: Take 栢 栢?The.Matrix.Path.Of.Neo.CloneDVD-MiRROR, which is SecuROM 栢 栢?7.00.00.0014 on DVD, and burn it. Burn it in a120, 4x speed. You 栢 栢?can even enable RPMS. Once your done burning, install it, then 栢 栢?try to play it. It Doesn't work now does it? right, mount it 栢 栢?and use SR7, works fine. This means DVDS only work MOUNTED. 栢 栢?Now, Take 06.27.05.The.Bards.Tale.CD.Version.BWClone-XMAFT, which 栢 栢?has SecuROM 7.00.00.0115, without IDE whoring. Open up everyone's 栢 栢?least favorite program Blindwrite, following the nfo instructions 栢 栢?to burn it and hit yes to include physicall informations. 栢 栢?If you own a Plextor Premium (highly doubt you even heard of) 栢 栢?it should burn a fully 1:1 clone, which will work flawlessley. 栢 栢?If you own a Liteon or other drives, it will burn a 栢 栢?Twin-sectored clone, that will work just as well. Point being, 栢 栢?CDS work burnt, burnt 1:1 and mounted, while DVDS work mounted 栢 栢?only. Just because it works does not mean its Top Quality to us. 栢 栢?All of our releases are above and beyond the requirements, we 栢 栢?take pride in this, and as far as were concenred, oher groups 栢 栢?that want to release shit quality images is just proper fodder 栢 栢?for us. Groups seriously need to get off their hurt egos after a 栢 栢?proper, and learn WHY they have been propered. Then when they 栢 栢?decide to do another release, they look back and avoid the 栢 栢?mistake they did last time. They need to LEARN from their mistake 栢 栢?and stop licking their wounds. This is the point of having nukers 栢 栢?and propers, to keep the quality up. Some people actually do 栢 栢?want quality still. You really want to hurt MiRROR? Start 栢 栢?releasing good unproperable not-shit images so we will actually 栢 栢?have to be faster. 栢 栢? 栢 栢?"2. We don't think m0 compression should be propered unless you 栢 栢?are racing, as that is just wasting bandwidth." - That's something栢 栢?we both agree on. ST0N3D was a valid release, nothing wrong with 栢 栢?it. They beat us on releasing it, and we couldn't find anything 栢 栢?wrong with the image itself. Every release should be that good. 栢 栢? 栢 栢?"3. 'Use serials from other source' is seriously lame. Make your 栢 栢?own serials or don't release. " - First, We only say this on 栢 栢?releases where its very possible to get your own key. Not every 栢 栢?group has keygenners and we simply choose not to leak our tagged 栢 栢?keys and expose our suppliers when releasing a game, It is too 栢 栢?risky to give away our supplier's keys, hell we don't even ask 栢 栢?them for the key to play it ourselves. We had Battlefield 2 栢 栢?Special Forces DVD and CD days preretail, but our supplier had 栢 栢?a tagged key. We chose not to release it with the tagged key, 栢 栢?simply because we do not have keygenners and we don't want to 栢 栢?expose our suppliers. After PCGAME released BF2SF DVD, We 栢 栢?released the CD version with use serial from other sources simply 栢 栢?because we figured that it is very easy for the end user to go on 栢 栢?a dox site and download a 5 kilobyte keygen. For people to whine 栢 栢?because they are too lazy to look for the other keys is really 栢 栢?pathetic and very unappreciative of the work MiRROR and our 栢 栢?suppliers do. Besides, someone has to proper all those bad 栢 栢?clones. 栢 栢? 栢 栢?"4. SFclones are not 'true 1:1 copies.' Otherwise, they would 栢 栢?work on burners as well as regular non-burner cdroms just like 栢 栢?the original would. " SFCLONES Are 1:1 copies, if you actually 栢 栢?read some of the nfos we write, it would say Starforce looks for 栢 栢?the ATIP sectors on burnt cds to see if theres anything 栢 栢?indicating its a cdr. IF ATIP says CDR with chemical types, SF 栢 栢?DONT RUN. RETAIL Discs have no atip information. Since CDROMS 栢 栢?cant read atip, it works fine on there. Blame the damned media 栢 栢?manufactueres, or actually blame your favorite program Alcohol 栢 栢?120 for writing a ATIP Blocker that sucks soo bad it only works 栢 栢?on Safedisc. Maybe if A120 Developer team wasn't whoring 栢 栢?emulation soo much then they would have already coded 1:1 methods 栢 栢?of burning securom and have better atip hiders for Starforce, but 栢 栢?I guess you make more money with a app that is required on all 栢 栢?machines to emulate badly imaged clones, than writing an app that 栢 栢?makes true 1:1 clones and works on computers that dont have a120 栢 栢?installed. Awesome marketing a120! Also, if youre too dumb to 栢 栢?know what ATIP is, look it up on cdfreaks, since you beleive that 栢 栢?site more than anything else. Actually, what do you care about 栢 栢?making true quality 1:1 clones that don't need emulation? From the栢 栢?way you bitched in your nfo, and made that crap image, it sounded 栢 栢?like making proper clones will bring the end of the world and 栢 栢?Alcohol with all it's emulation was the second coming of Christ. 栢 栢?And lastly, yes we may be a newly formed group, but our members 栢 栢?are from much older groups. Its really very childish to bash 栢 栢?groups just because they are new, especially since most of these 栢 栢?new groups risk a lot so that you can have the best possible 栢 栢?quality releases for free. 栢 栢? 栢 栢?Read our upcoming Q&A for more information and Enjoy this Proper 栢 꾼?release. 栢 꾼? 栢 꾼? ? 栢 꾼? ? 栢 꾼? 査? 栢 꾼? 昉白 栢 꾼? ?百 栢 꾼? 꿇 栢 栢? 殯 栢 栢幡 複複複 賽꿀複 栢 栢 兵?? 複蔔賽賽 ?? 賽賞複 霜栢 昉?? ? 蔔賽 ?? ? 三白 査? 昉??賞?査? ??兵? 査百 꾼? 輻 旁?? ??賞? ?? ? 複栢? 蔔賞? 死 旁?? ? 賽白複 ? 複複꿉賽 複 殯?栢 白 方?? ? 賽賽白複 賽賽賽 賞? 賞蔔? 견白方? ? 賽白 査? 賞? 倂?栢昉 ? 輻 査? ? 複兵굅? 蔔? 査 檳굉繃栢? 死 昉 輻賽 複蔔賽? 輻 ? 蔔? 煞霜栢方 ? 霜? 께 ? ? 蔔賽 死 輻 栢 蔔?栢 OMG SID ? 三? 께 ? 査 霜 ? 霜 死 栢 幡 栢 死兵?殯? 꾼 ? 賞? 三? 賞? 꿀 栢 死 兵蔔꿀? ? 複? ?兵? 꾼輻 ? 兵? 殯? 殯? 栢 霜 ?泗 ??蔔?? 兵? ASCII 三百 같??같 兵? ?? 蔔? 蔔? 栢 査輻死査?三?殯? irokos ? ? ?? 複複蔔幡白複꿉? ? 栢 百 霜賞複 賞? <TITAN> ? 같굇꿀? 三?같複複輻賽賽꿀複? 栢 査? 賽蔔幡白複輻霜複 査껐갚굉께? 賽賽꿀複 賽三複 栢 賞栢複? 賽賽賞栢栢栢껑같같 꾼昉같굇께?같같같같같굇께複 賽꿀 三栢 賽賞栢栢白複複複複? 査껐갛굉께? 複複??賽白 賞 査? 賽賽賞旁栢栢賽賞複 같껑긋? 複幡賽 複複 ?檳? 死 賞? ?賽賞白 賞 ? 蔔? 複幡賽 ? 幡 ? 昉 賞? 死 ? 査 蔔?兵?三? ? 複複輻? 査? ? ? 금 査? 霜複複꿉賽賽賽? 栢 ?MIRROR ? 栢 兵賽煞 ?? ? 殯 賞?賽賽賽견 栢幡 갛 ?? ? 霜殯 ? ? 栢? 兵白 ?? ? 査꿉 께 薩 ? 百 ? 굇 ? ? 같 ?
불량게시글신고